Saturday, March 14, 2020
Press and Politics essays
Press and Politics essays Attitudes of different press to the withdrawal of the anti-subversion bill In this project, we are going to look into different attitudes of a number of newspapers in HK to the controversy issue C withdrawal of the anti-subversion bill, which sparked massive street protests and triggered the territory's worst political crisis since 1997. To make it clearer, it is a postponement of the legislation procedure of the national security bill only, but not a cancellation of the Article 23. First, we can take a look on the editorial of MingPao (see reference article no.1) on 2003-09-06. Actually, we can see the general attitude of newspapers in Hong Kong hold attitudes more or less similar. à ¡Ã °Ã ¡Ã ÃŽÃâÃâÃâ¢"à ³Ãâ° Ã Ã ¡Ã ¹Ã ¾Ã ¡23-là ¡Ã à ¡ à ¡Ã °Ã ¡Ã We support the legislation of the Article 23 in the Basic Law à ¡Ã à ¡ MingPao support the legislation, but more consultation and consideration is needed before the implementation. à ¡Ã °Ã ¡Ã à ³ÃËâ⬠¡Ã ¸Ã °Ã ²Ã ²Ã à °Ã ¸Ã ¡Ã ÃÅ Ãâ¡ÃÆ'à ·Ãâ"Ãâ¡Ã µÃâà »Ã Ãâ¡Ã °Ã ¸ÃâºÃËÃâ¹Ã µÃâÃâiÃ
à ¡Ã ¡ à ¡Ã °Ã ¡Ã the withdrawal of the national security bill à ¡Ã is wise, it meets the will of Hong Kong Peopleà ¡ So, the postponement of the bill is welcomed, and they generally think it can do goods to the economy. à ¡Ã °Ã ¡Ã ÃŽÃâÃâÃâ¢JÃ
¾ÃÅ'ÃË...^Ãâ¢Ã ¾Ã ¸ÃËà ²Ãâ°iÃâ¡Ã ÃÅ Ã ¡23-lß^à ³ÃÅ'Ãâ¹Ã ¹Ã ¸Ã µÃâeÃâ¢`à ÃËà µÃâ"à ¸ÃâÃâ"ÃâÃâ Ãâ Ãâ¡ÃâÃâà ¼Ã ³Ã ¡ ÃâÃâÃÆ'à µÃâÃâ"à ·iLià Ãâ¹Ãâ à µÃâÃâ¢Ã ¾Ãâ"ÃŽÃ
¾ÃâyÃŸà ¾^mà ³Fà ¡ à ¡Ã °Ã ¡Ã if the government does not change its working style of à ¡listening to the supporters voice onlyà ¡Ã ¯, à ¡making everyone either frie...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.